All the programs are listed by category with detailed descriptions. Fuji Box 9100 Hyper Software Testing. Note software program itself. Bin software update for fuji box 9100 hyper receiver. How to unlock the scrambled channels in the. How to unlock the scrambled channels in the echosat 9100x.
I just looked at the specs on the Fuji website. Here are the differences I can see: Improvement file compression. On the 9000, it is impossible to save a single RAW file on a 16 MB card. On the 9100, it is possible to save 13 RAW images on a 16 MB card.
The JPEG format has similar improvements. The Fuji hyper-utility software for processing RAW images is included with the camera. Previously it had to be purchased, $100.
Fuji is offering a wide-angle auxiliary lens. On the 9000 Fuji did not recommend using auxiliary lenses. I'm obviously not looking at the same place on fujifilm.com as you jphess but the comparision chart for the cameras and the performance chart for the S9600 only shows JPEG as a file format - CCD RAW which appears on the others isn't shown as an option for the S9600.
Given the nature of a RAW file compressing it from 18MB to 1.2MB (if 13 are to fit a 16MB card) is an enormous compression ratio - I would be surprised if this was possible without the data loss that RAW is supposed to avoid. As I understand it RAW data is simply the levels from all of the pixels not processed in any way by the camera - it would be possible to compress such files (using WinZip or similar) but they would then need to be uncompressed before RAW processing software could read them - even then you would only get a compression ratio of 18:1.2 if the image contained almost no detail at all.
Further improvements in JPEG compression would, as far as I am concerned, result in larger files - that is to say a less agressive compression - thats just my opinion anyway. Below is a link to the web page containing the specs for the S9100. The sixth item in the list tells how many files of the different formats will fit on a 16 MB card. I agree that this looks like very aggressive file compression. And I'm wondering if it will have any impact on image quality. I suppose only time will tell. The size of the RAW images has been my main complaint about the S9000.
I thought 18 MB was just a little unreasonable when a Nikon RAW file from a 6 MP DSLR use only about 5 MB. But I hope Fuji hasn't gone too far in the other direction now. Wrote: I don't know that it's a rip off. But I don't think it's a camera to 'move up to' if you already have a 9000/9500. The lens appears to be the same, as do the features of the camera. Like someone mentioned previously, it seems that the Fuji could provide a firmware upgrade that would give the 9000/9500 the same file compression features. The Hyper-utility software program has been available for purchase at $100, and it's included with the new camera.
To my knowledge, it has only been offered with the S3 previously. So, if the camera is priced right, it would be a good upgrade for someone with a smaller camera. But personally, there is nothing to motivate me to upgrade.
I have enough cards now to handle any shooting situation I encounter. Rules Curling Skins Game Casino there. So the secret is, unless you are one of these people who absolutely has to have the latest, wait for a few months because it will save you a significant amount of money. I don't think Fuji is trying to get current users of the 9000/9500 to move up to this camera. It seems to me that they are making minor changes and evaluating their impact on the sale to new users. Transformers Prime In Hindi Full Episodes.
Then, eventually, I think they will probably come out with a whole new series that pushes the envelope a little further. That is only my opinion.